Journal: Journal of Neurochemistry
Article Title: Dynamics of Neuronal and Astrocytic Energy Molecules in Epilepsy
doi: 10.1111/jnc.70044
Figure Lengend Snippet: Rapid increase in pyruvate signal in astrocytes. (A) A FRET‐based cytosolic pyruvate fluorescence sensor was specifically expressed in astrocytes (Mlc1‐tTA::TetO‐PYRS transgenic mice). An optical fiber and a pair of stimulating electrodes were implanted into the hippocampus. Following a train of hippocampal stimulation, epileptic AD was generated (EEG; the shown trace was band‐pass filtered at 1–100 Hz), and fluctuations in the fYFP (green), fCFP (blue), and dYFP (red) signals were observed. In contrast to the binding of ATP to ATeam, FRET efficiency is expected to decrease upon the binding of pyruvate to PYRS. Astrocytic pyruvate concentration transients were estimated using either the ratio method (fCFP/fYFP) or the difference method (dYFP–fYFP). Tri‐phasic pyruvate concentration dynamics was estimated using the difference method. The onset of the first phase of the pyruvate signal increase was defined as the point where the signal exceeds the baseline. The positive peak of the pyruvate signal was also identified. (B) The positive peak of the pyruvate signal estimated using the ratio method was plotted against that obtained with the difference method ( n = 9 episodes from 3 animals). A linear regression line was fitted to the data plot with a fixed y ‐intercept at (0, 0). (C) A representative recording from a Thy1‐ATeam mouse. (D) Representative recordings of the astrocytic PYRS signal and the neuronal ATeam signal were vertically aligned on a close‐up time scale. The astrocytic pyruvate signal exhibited a transient negative deflection followed by a steep increase. The onset of the pyruvate signal increase was defined as the point where the pyruvate signal crossed the baseline. The neuronal ATP signal decreased following hippocampal stimulation. The onset of the ATP signal reduction was determined by identifying the negative peak of the second derivative of the ATP signal trace (i.e., the inflection point). Additionally, the positive peak of the pyruvate signal and the negative peak of the ATP signal were identified. (E) The onset of the first phase of the pyruvate signal increase in astrocytes (top, 2.72 ± 0.27, n = 3 animals) and the onset of the ATP signal reduction in neurons (bottom, 13.50 ± 2.83, n = 7 animals) were compared. A significant difference in the onset times was found between the astrocytic pyruvate signal and the neuronal ATP signal (Welch's t ‐test, degree of freedom = 8, t = −3.789, p = 0.008, data presented as the mean ± SEM). (F) The initial positive peak of the pyruvate signal corresponds to the onset of the signal's decrease from its maximum (top, 20.75 ± 1.31 s, n = 3 animals). This was compared with the time of the negative peak of the ATP signal in neurons (bottom, 31.86 ± 3.28 s, n = 7 animals). A significant difference was found between these times (Welch's t ‐test, degree of freedom = 8, t = −3.148, p = 0.015, data presented as the mean ± SEM). In addition to individual data points, the mean ± SEM is presented. Statistical significance was set as * p < 0.05 and ** p < 0.01.
Article Snippet: Using fiber photometry in transgenic mice expressing the ATP sensor ATeam specifically in the cytosol of neurons (Thy1‐ATeam; Trevisiol et al. ), we observed that the CFP fluorescence (fCFP), excited by Blue light (~440 nm) increased, while the YFP fluorescence (fYFP) decreased with hippocampal train stimulation (Figure ).
Techniques: Fluorescence, Transgenic Assay, Generated, Binding Assay, Concentration Assay